Compression Members Compression members are structural elements primarily subjected to axial compressive forces and hence, their design is guided by considerations of strength and buckling. examples: pedestal, column, wall and strut. while pedestal, column and wall carry the loads along its length in vertical direction, the strut in truss carries loads in any direction. These compression members may be made of bricks or reinforced concrete. 10.21.2 Definitions (a) Effective length: The vertical distance between the points of inflection of the compression member in the buckled configuration in a plane is termed as effective length of that compression member in that plane. The effective length is different from the unsupported length L of the member, though it depends on the unsupported length and the type of end restraints. The relation between the effective and unsupported lengths of any compression member is Le kl where K is the ratio of effective to the unsupported lengths. Clause 25.2 of IS 456 stipulates the effective lengths of compression members (vide Annex E of IS 456). This parameter is needed in classifying and designing the compression members. (b) Pedestal: Pedestal is a vertical 9 does not exceed three times of its 26.5.3.1h, Note). The other horizontal of b(Fig.10.21.1a). (c) Column: Column is shall not exceed sixty the two ends. Further, exceed 100bA2/D, where restricted up to four compression member whose effective length least horizontal dimension b (cl. dimension D shall not exceed four times a vertical compression member whose unsupported length L times of b (least lateral dimension), if restrained at its unsupported length of a cantilever column shall not D is the larger lateral dimension which is also times of b (vide cl. 25.3 of IS 456 and Fig.1 0.21 .1 b). (d) wall: wall is a vertical compression member whose effective height H to thickness t(least lateral dimension) shall not exceed 30 (cl. 32.2.3 of IS 456). The larger horizontal dimension i.e., the length of the wall L is more than 4t (Fig.10.21.1c). 10.21.3 Classification Based on the types classified into three (i) Tied columns: The closely spaced lateral (ii) Columns with reinforcement bars are spiral reinforcement. (Fig.10.21.2b). of Columns Based on Types of Reinforcement of reinforcement, the reinforced concrete columns are groups: main longitudinal reinforcement bars are enclosed within ties (Fig.10.21.2a). helical reinforcement: The main longitudinal enclosed within closely spaced and continuously wound Circular and octagonal columns are mostly of this type (iii) Composite columns: The main longitudinal reinforcement of the composite columns consists of structural steel sections or pipes with or without longitudinal bars (Fig.20.21.2c and d). out of the three types of columns, the tied columns are mostly common with different shapes of the cross-sections viz. square, rectangular, T, L, cross etc. Helically bound columns are also used for circular or octagonal shapes of cross-sections. Architects prefer circular columns in some specific situations for the functional requirement. 10.21.4 Classification Columns are classified (i) Columns subjected of Columns Based on Loadings into the three following types to axial loads only (concentric), based on the loadings: as shown in Fig.20.21.3a. (ii) Columns subjected Fig.10.21.3b. (iii) Columns subjected Fig.10.21.3c. to combined to combined axial axial load load and uniaxial and biaxial bending, bending, as shown in as shown in / Figure 10.21.4 shows the plan view of a reinforced concrete rigid frame having columns and inter-connecting beams in longitudinal and transverse directions. From the knowledge of structural analysis it is well known that the bending moments on the left and right of columns for every longitudinal beam will be comparable as the beam is continuous. Similarly, the bending moments at the two sides of columns for every continuous transverse beam are also comparable. All internal columns will be designed for axial force only. The side columns will have axial forces with uniaxial bending moment, while the four corner columns shall have axial forces with biaxial bending moments. It is worth mentioning that pure axial forces in the inside columns is a rare case. Due to rigid frame action, lateral loadings and practical aspects of construction, there will be bending moments and horizontal shear in all the inside columns also. Similarly, side columns and corner columns will have the column shear along with the axial force and bending moments in one or both directions, respectively. The effects of shear are usually neglected as the magnitude is very small. Moreover, the presence of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is sufficient to resist the effect of column shear of comparatively low magnitude. The effect of some minimum bending moment, however, should be taken into account in the design even if the column is axially loaded. Accordingly, cls. 39.2 and 25.4 of IS 456 prescribes the minimum eccentricity for the design of all columns. In case the actual eccentricity is more than the minimum, that should be considered in the design. 10.21.5 Classification of Columns are classified Columns into Based the following on Slenderness two types Ratios based on the slenderness ratios: (i) Short columns (ii) Slender or long columns Figure 10.21.5 presents the three modes of failure of columns with different slenderness ratios when loaded axially. In the mode 1, column does not undergo any lateral deformation and collapses due to material failure. This is known as compression failure. Due to the combined effects of axial load and moment a short column may have material failure of mode 2. On the other hand, a slender column subjected to axial load only undergoes deflection due to beamcolumn effect and may have material failure under the combined action of direct load and bending moment. Such failure is called combined compression and bending failure of mode 2. Mode 3 failure is by elastic instability of very long column even under small load much before the material reaches the yield stresses. This type of failure is known as elastic buckling. The slenderness ratio of steel column is the ratio of its effective length Le to its least radius of gyration r. In case of reinforced concrete column, however, IS 456 stipulates the slenderness ratio as the ratio of its effective length Le to its least lateral dimension. As mentioned earlier in sec. 10.21.2(a), the effective length is different from the unsupported length, the rectangular reinforced concrete column of crosssectional dimensions b and D shall have two effective lengths in the two directions of b and D. Accordingly, the column may have the possibility of buckling depending on the two values of slenderness ratios as given below: Slenderness ratio about the major axis Slenderness ratio about the minor axis Lex/D Ley/b A compression member may be considered as short when both the slenderness ratios Lex/D and Ley/b are less than 12 where Lex: effective length in respect of the major axis, D = depth in respect of the major axis, Ley effective length in respect of the minor axis, and b = width of the member. It shall otherwise be considered as a slender compression member. Further, it is essential to avoid the mode 3 type of failure of columns so that all columns should have material failure (modes 1 and 2) only. Accordingly, cl. 25.3.1 of IS 456 stipulates the maximum unsupported length between two restraints of a column to sixty times its least lateral dimension. For cantilever columns, when one end of the column is unrestrained, the unsupported length is restricted to 100bA2/D. 10.21.6 Braced and unbraced columns It is desirable that the columns do not have to resist any horizontal loads due to wind or earthquake. This can be achieved by bracing the columns as in the case of columns of a water tank or tall buildings (Figs.10.21.6a and b). Lateral tie members for the columns of water tank or shear walls for the columns of tall buildings resist the horizontal forces and these columns are called braced columns. Unbraced columns are supposed to resist the horizontal loads also. The bracings can be lateral loads. It is into account by the (vide Annex E of IS in one or more directions depending on the directions of the worth mentioning that the effect of bracing has been taken IS code in determining the effective lengths of columns 456). 10.21.? Longitudinal Reinforcement: The longitudinal reinforcing bars carry the compressive loads along with the concrete. (a) The minimum amount of steel should be at least 0.8 per cent of the gross cross sectional area of the column required if for any reason the provided area is more than the required area. (b) The maximum amount of steel should be 4 per cent of the gross crosssectional area of the column so that it does not exceed 6 per cent when bars from column below have to be lapped with those in the column under consideration. (c) Four and six are the minimum number of longitudinal bars in rectangular and circular columns, respectively. (d) The diameter of the longitudinal bars should be at least 12 mm. (e) Columns having helical bars within placed the and in Contact reinforcement with the shall helical have at least reinforcement. six longitudinal The bars shall equidistant around its inner circumference. (f) The bars shall be spaced not exceeding 300 mm along the periphery be of column. (g) The amount of reinforcement for the crosssectional area provided. pedestal shall be at least 0.15 per cent of 10.21.8 Transverse Reinforcement: Transverse reinforcing bars are provided in forms of circular rings, polygonal links (lateral ties) with internal angles not exceeding 135° or helical reinforcement. The transverse reinforcing bars are provided to ensure that every longitudinal bar nearest to the compression face has effective lateral support against buckling. (a) Transverse reinforcement shall only go round corner and alternate bars if the longitudinal bars are not spaced more than 75 mm on either side(Fig.10.21.7). (b) Longitudinal bars spaced at a maximum distance of 48 times the diameter of the tie shall be tied by single tie and additional open ties for in between longitudinal bars (Fig.10.21.8). (c) For longitudinal bars placed in more than one row (Fig.10.21.9): (i) transverse reinforcement is provided for the outer most row in accordance with (a) above, and (ii) no bar of the inner row is closer to the nearest compression face than three times the diameter of the largest bar in the inner row. (d) For longitudinal bars arranged in a group such that they are not in contact and each group is adequately tied as per (a), (b) or (c) above, as appropriate, the transverse reinforcement for the compression member as a whole may be provided assuming that each group is a single longitudinal bar for determining the pitch and diameter of the transverse reinforcement as given in sec.10.21.9. The diameter (Fig.10.21.10). 10.21.9 (a) of Pitch Pitch: such and transverse Diameter of The maximum pitch reinforcement Lateral should not, however, exceed 20 mm Ties of transverse reinforcement shall be the least of the following: (i) the least lateral dimension (ii) sixteen times the smallest to be tied; and (iii) 300 mm. of the compression members; diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement bar (b) Diameter: The diameter of the polygonal links or lateral ties shall be not less than one fourth of the diameter of the largest longitudinal bar, and in no case less than 10.21.10 6 mm. Helical Reinforcement (a) Pitch: Helical reinforcement shall be of regular formation with the turns of the helix spaced evenly and its ends shall be anchored properly by providing one and a half extra turns of the spiral bar. The pitch of helical reinforcement shall be determined as given in sec.10.21.9 for all cases except where an increased load on the column is allowed for on the strength of the helical reinforcement. In such cases only, the maximum pitch shall be the lesser of 75 mm and onesixth of the core diameter of the column, and the minimum pitch shall be the lesser of 25 mm and three times the diameter of the steel bar forming the helix. (b) Diameter: The diameter of the helical reinforcement shall be as mentioned in sec.10.21.9b. 10.21.11 Assumptions in the Design of Compression Members by Limit State of Collapse Tied and helically reinforced short and slender columns subjected to axial loadings with or without the combined effects of uniaxial or biaxial bending will be taken up. The assumptions (i) to (v) given in sec.3.4.2 of Lesson 4 for the design of flexural members are also applicable here. Further more, the following are the additional assumptions for the design of compression members (cl. 39.1 of IS 456). (i) The maximum compressive strain in concrete in axial compression is taken as 0.002. (ii) The maximum compressive strain at the highly compressed extreme fibre in concrete subjected to axial compression and bending and when there is no tension on the section shall be 0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain at the least compressed extreme fibre. The assumptions (i) to (v) of section 3.4.2 of Lesson 4 and (i) and (ii) mentioned above are discussed below with reference to Fig.10.21.11a to c presenting the cross-section and strain diagrams for different location of the neutral axis. The discussion made in sec. 3.4.2 of Lesson 4 regarding the assumptions (i), (iii), (iv) and (v) are applicable here also. Assumption (ii) of sec.3.4.2 is also applicable here when kD, the depth of neutral axis from the highly compressed right edge is within the section i.e., K < 1. The corresponding strain profile IN in Fig.10.21.11b is for particular value of P and M such that the maximum compressive strain is 0.0035 at the highly compressed right edge and tensile strain develops at the opposite edge. This strain profile is very much similar to that of a beam in flexure of Lesson 4. The additional assumption (i) of this section refers to column subjected axial load P only resulting compressive strain of maximum (constant) value 0.002 and for which the strain profile is EF in Fig.10.21.11b. The neutral is of axis at infinity (outside the section). Extending the assumption of the strain profile IN (Fig.10.21.11b), we can draw another strain profile IH (Fig.10.21.11c) having maximum compressive strain of 0.0035 at the right edge and zero strain at the left edge. This strain profile 1H along with EF are drawn in Fig.10.21.11c to intersect at V. From the two similar triangles EVI and GHI, we have EV/GH 3/7, 0.0015/0.0035 which gives EV = 3D/7 (10.2) The point the strain V, where the two profiles profiles when the neutral intersect is assumed to act as a fulcrum axis lies outside the section. Another for strain profile axis is JK drawn on this figure passing through the fulcrum outside the section. The maximum compressive strain V and whose neutral GJ of this profile is related to the minimum compressive GJ = GI similar IJ/HK IJ = GI 0.75 triangles = VENF The value strain HK, as we can write HK as explained IJ in term below. of HK from two JVI and HVK: = 0.75. of the maximum compressive strain GJ for the profile JK is, therefore, 0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain HK on the least compressed This is the assumption (ii) of this section (cl. 39.1b of IS 456). 10.21.12 Minimum Eccentricity: In practical construction, columns are edge. rarely truly concentric. Even a theoretical column loaded axially will have accidental eccentricity due to inaccuracy in construction or variation of materials etc. Accordingly, all axially loaded columns should be designed considering the minimum eccentricity as stipulated in cl. 25.4 of IS 456 and given below (Fig.10.21.3c) em,-,, 2 greater of )I/500 + D/30) or 20 mm eymjn 2 greater of )I/500 + b/30) or 20 mm where L, D and b are the unsupported length, larger lateral dimension, respectively. lateral dimension and least